Over at the Online Journal Website they have put together a great list of what the Democrats had to say about Republican efforts to reform Fannie and Freddie. The following quotes will amaze you when you consider the fact that they are trying to lay all of the blame on President Bush
House Financial Services Committee hearing, Sept. 10, 2003:
Rep. Barney Frank (D., Mass.): I worry, frankly, that there’s a tension here. The more people, in my judgment, exaggerate a threat of safety and soundness, the more people conjure up the possibility of serious financial losses to the Treasury, which I do not see. I think we see entities that are fundamentally sound financially and withstand some of the disaster scenarios. . . .
Rep. Maxine Waters (D., Calif.), speaking to Housing and Urban Development Secretary Mel Martinez:
Secretary Martinez, if it ain’t broke, why do you want to fix it? Have the GSEs [government-sponsored enterprises] ever missed their housing goals?
* * *
House Financial Services Committee hearing, Sept. 25, 2003:
Rep. Frank: I do think I do not want the same kind of focus on safety and soundness that we have in OCC [Office of the Comptroller of the Currency] and OTS [Office of Thrift Supervision]. I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidized housing. . . .
* * *
House Financial Services Committee hearing, Sept. 25, 2003:
Rep. Waters: However, I have sat through nearly a dozen
hearings where, frankly, we were trying to fix something that wasn’t
broke. Housing is the economic engine of our economy, and in no
community does this engine need to work more than in mine. With last
week’s hurricane and the drain on the economy from the war in Iraq, we
should do no harm to these GSEs. We should be enhancing regulation, not making fundamental change.Mr. Chairman, we do not have a crisis at Freddie Mac, and in
particular at Fannie Mae, under the outstanding leadership of Mr. Frank
Raines. Everything in the 1992 act has worked just fine. In fact, the
GSEs have exceeded their housing goals. . . .
* * *
Senate Banking Committee, Oct. 16, 2003:
Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.): And my worry is that we’re using the recent safety and soundness concerns, particularly with Freddie, and with a poor regulator, as a straw man to curtail Fannie and Freddie’s mission. And I don’t think there is any doubt that there are some in the administration who don’t believe in Fannie and Freddie altogether, say let the private sector do it. That would be sort of an ideological position.
Mr. Raines: But more importantly, banks are in a far more risky business than we are.
* * *
Senate Banking Committee, Feb. 24-25, 2004:
Sen. Thomas Carper (D., Del.): What is the wrong that we’re trying to right here? What is the potential harm that we’re trying to avert?
Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan: Well, I think that that is a very good question, senator.
What we’re trying to avert is we have in our financial system right now two very large and growing financial institutions which are very effective and are essentially capable of gaining market shares in a very major market to a large extent as a consequence of what is perceived to be a subsidy that prevents the markets from adjusting appropriately, prevents competition and the normal adjustment processes that we see on a day-by-day basis from functioning in a way that creates stability. . . . And so what we have is a structure here in which a very rapidly growing organization, holding assets and financing them by subsidized debt, is growing in a manner which really does not in and of itself contribute to either home ownership or necessarily liquidity or other aspects of the financial markets. . . .
Related articles by Zemanta
- Fannie And Freddie Take Over Push
- Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Pay Limit?
- Fannie And Freddie Rescue Could Cost $25B
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=d6ba1ce8-589d-4aae-b57d-06cf6421758a)
